The foundation for every legal relationship between two or more parties is established on a basis of a contract. A contract is a document containing a set of terms and clauses framed by the individuals, companies and/or other legal entities that specifically dictates the relationship between such individuals in the future. Once the contract is drafted, affirmed and signed by the parties, it must be registered. Please note that registration of a contract is a very important task that must be completed by the parties to the contract (refer to “why register a contract” in this article for more on this).
Drafting of a contract is the step-by-step inclusion of specific clauses, terms and conditions that are expressed as per the needs and wants of the party/parties to the contract. While making a draft one must consider various issues including the subject of the contract, goods to be manufactured, amount of consideration, indemnity, dispute resolution, et cetera.
Once a draft is complete, it must be reviewed. In my personal opinion, every person should ideally get a contract reviewed before signing the contract and entering into agreement with the other parties to such contract. This type of reviewing can be called pre-contract review; although post contract reviewing is the practice which we see most often in our experiences.
To put it simply, contract review is the thorough analysis of the terms, clauses and conditions that are inscribed in the contract. It is an attempt to understand each clause along with the purpose behind framing of such clause. Every person can review the contract himself/herself thoroughly or seek professional assistance from attorneys and advocates to do the review for them. We must keep in mind that contract review can solve many problems and issues at an early stage thereby avoiding losses or harassment in the long run.
In this article, we will look into a few areas that we all must consider while drafting and reviewing a contract. Please note that this is not a subject that most of us were taught in our years in law school; this is a skill that many of us have developed over years of experience. Thus, even though this article only describes briefly how one can draft and review a contract, this article itself is an attempt to bridge the gap between the theory and the practical – between the study of the documents and laws and their practical applicability and relationship.
This is a topic that has been in debate for a very long time. Contracts are basically of two types: oral and written. Oral contracts can be seen as a system of understanding between the parties whereby they agree to certain terms that are orally made and to act on such term. Written contracts are contracts wherein the party/parties to the contract express and record each and every term of the agreement between them. While in most countries both the types contracts are taken to be valid, when it comes to the enforceability of such contracts, the latter is easily relied upon and is much easier to function with.
Oral contracts are very difficult to prove in the Court of law because of its nature. Since nothing is expressly recorded, this becomes the first defense that every lawyer uses to escape from any dispute or suit against his/her client. The victim in such cases will have a difficult time to prove that there, in fact, exists an oral contract between the parties which is legally binding and enforceable upon the parties to such contract and that he/she/it is a victim to the violation of certain terms so agreed upon under such contract.
Hence, it is always advisable to make use of a written contract. Such contract will consist of specific clauses which may be written by one or more parties to the contract, but is only considered legally binding when all the parties to the contract give their consent to it. Thus, the terms that are agreed upon are recorded in a documented form. These contracts are much easier to rely upon in practicality as the relationship between and the rights & obligations of the parties to the contract are jotted down in the contract itself, thereby eliminating any kind of ambiguity that may arise in the future.
Written contracts are a much safer option to choose from when we look at the practical procedures and enforceability that both arise in lieu of the two types of contracts. But, please note that even if a contract is written, it cannot be considered totally safe or entirely relied upon until and unless it is registered.
Currently, in many countries throughout the globe, the laws do not expressly state that all contracts must be mandatorily registered in order for them to be legally enforceable and recognizable; however, when a party becomes a victim to some default made by the other party/parties, it becomes highly tedious for the victim to prove the legality, binding effect and validity of the contract. Adding to this, there are also application of various laws to the same subject which may lead to confusion as to whether contracts should be registered of not.
For example, in India, the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that all agreements, whether oral or written, are valid if and when:
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not talk about registration or stamping of any contract whatsoever.
However, provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, enumerates the documents which must be compulsorily registered for them to be legally recognizable and enforceable in the Court of law, these include: instruments related to immovable property (sale deed, deed of lease, gift deed, et cetera), instruments of movable property amounting to Rs. 100 or above, et cetera.
Further, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 expressly mentions that documents such as a Power of Attorney (except with the power to sell an immovable property), Development Agreement, et cetera shall be made on a stamp paper but need not be compulsorily registered for them to be legally enforceable.
Such provision create a sort of vagueness as to what are the types of contracts that must or must not be compulsorily registered in order for them to be legally enforceable in the eyes of Law. Therefore, it is advised that parties should get their contracts registered if they want to avoid any vagueness and unnecessary harassment and/or losses and/or litigation costs that may arise in the long-run.
The person reviewing the contract must also understand the importance of registration of a contract. If the review of the contract is taking place pre-registration, then one must understand the importance of each clause and how changing/modifying any unwanted terms can save the parties much harassment and cost in the future. If the review is taking place post-registration, it helps the reviewer understand the gravity of the clauses imbibed in contract and how such clauses will affect both parties, especially in times of dispute.
The Basic Process:
Firstly, the person drafting/reviewing the contract must attain the knowledge of the purpose of making the contract. One must understand what the subject and object of the contract is and what is the role played by the parties in achieving the desired subject/object. The contract must include the right and duties that the parties to the contract have in relation to one another. Each of the parties is there to fulfill a particular purpose and such purpose and role must be easily and clearly understood while drafting as well as reviewing the contract.
Secondly, the feasibility of the contract must be kept in mind – whether the terms and conditions given in the contract are capable of being carried out; whether the parties to the contract are capable of executing their rights and duties; which party/parties gain most and which one takes upon most of the liability during the tenure of the contract; et cetera. Such questions need to be answered in order to determine the feasibility of a contract.
Thirdly, one must be able to predict the issues and/or problems and/or disputes that may arise out of the contract in future scenarios. The person drafting as well as the person reviewing the contract must be able to understand what terms and clauses may give rise to a risk which may cause disputes and/or losses between the parties in the future. It must also be understood which clauses hold the loopholes in the contract and the possible permutation of ways in which such loopholes may later be exploited by the parties to the contract (Boilerplate clauses are often used to cleverly create and cover such loopholes).
Terms and Clauses:
There are certain basic terms and clauses that are very general and basic in nature. Such clauses form a part of every kind of contract.
The following are a few of such clauses:
This clause is not seen so often in contracts that had been drafted up until a few decades ago. However, in the current system we will find compensation clauses in most of the contracts that come to us. Consumers of services and products often invoke the compensation clause on various grounds and are often awarded large sums as compensation amounts by the Courts and/or tribunal, whatever the case may be.
Conclusion:
In my experience, these are small areas that are essential for the formation of a good contract. The inclusion of the afore stated terms and conditions will give the reader a detailed idea of what is sought to be achieved by the contract and what is the relationship between the parties.
Further, any dispute between the parties to the contract can be efficiently dealt with if the clauses given herein above are included in the contract. All such efforts will result in a contract which will save a lot of time, effort and costs which could have occurred otherwise.
Further, the review of the drafted contracts is equally as important as the drafting itself. If a contract is not reviewed, then the signing party or parties may be at risk of affirming terms and clauses which may not be favorable to them and which may cause them financial or mental injury in the future.